Judicial Reform Sparks Debate in Mexico

The recent initiative to reform the judiciary put forth by González Alcántara Carrancá has ignited strong reactions within Mexican politics. This project seeks to rein in judicial actions that are viewed as illegal, prompting a heated debate regarding the legality of decisions made by the Supreme Court. It suggests a race between the approval of this initiative and the Court’s deliberation on the legality of the reforms. Political figures, including Gerardo Fernández Noroña, have indicated that they do not consider routes such as impeachment as viable options. The Supreme Court session set for October 31 is a pivotal moment that could dictate the future of legality and legitimacy in government reforms. With increasing pressure surrounding the vote on this constitutional legislation, it is evident that politicians from the Morena party are advocating for the reform's approval before the Court makes its ruling. This scenario places citizens in a dilemma: either maintain the independence of the judiciary or consolidate legislative control over institutions. The lack of clarity and consensus on how to proceed is shaping the political future of the country.