Shenon Critiques Judicial Activism and Legitimacy Issues

10
0
In a recent intervention, President Sofia Shenon tackled the proposals presented by Minister GonzΓ‘lez AlcΓ‘ntara, asserting that political parties lack the legitimacy to challenge constitutional reforms due to their absence of legal personality. Within this context, the President emphasized that the Court should not act as a legislator and expressed concerns over the perceived political activism of the Supreme Court. She claimed that such activism could jeopardize the legitimacy of the Court, considering that several ministers have voiced opposition to the reform and might be influenced by personal interests. The discussion revolves around whether the ministers should refrain from participating in decisions that directly impact their positions. Shenon stated that the outcome of the vote should be awaited to evaluate any violation of constitutional and ethical principles by the Court. In this complex debate, the clash between popular will and judicial interpretation is evident, reminiscent of a chess game where each move by the ministers could alter the final outcome of the judicial reform.
Highlights
  • β€’ Sofia Shenon criticizes the activism of the Supreme Court.
  • β€’ Discusses the judicial reform presented by Minister GonzΓ‘lez AlcΓ‘ntara.
  • β€’ The president argues that parties lack legitimacy to challenge reforms.
  • β€’ It is emphasized that the Court should not act as a legislating body.
  • β€’ Shenon denounces the lack of neutrality among the ministers.
  • β€’ The impact of the Court's voting on the reform is debated.
  • β€’ The president notes that ministers have personal interests.
  • β€’ The outcome of the Court's voting is awaited.
  • β€’ The legitimacy of the Court is called into question.
  • β€’ The discussion reflects the clash between popular will and judicial authority.
* hawa bundu helped DAVEN to generate this content on 10/29/2024 .

More news