Central Banking's Role in Global Conflicts Revealed

Central banking has been a driving force behind global conflicts, often allowing bankers to profit from wars. The concept, introduced by economist Adam Smith, suggests that financing via taxes would result in shorter and less frequent wars. G. Edward Griffin's work, 'The Creature from Jekyll Island', delves deeper into this relationship, asserting that many significant wars over the past century were instigated by bankers seeking financial gain. The 'Bilderberg Formula' suggests that these elites finance both sides of a conflict to ensure profits, which increases national debts and grants them more influence over governments. Historical events like the Napoleonic Wars and World War I exemplify this dynamic, where powerful banking families profited regardless of the outcomes. Notably, during World War I, U.S. President Woodrow Wilson, influenced by financial interests and the Federal Reserve's establishment, waged war partly due to the sinking of the Lusitania—a ship secretly carrying weapons—a situation manipulated to galvanize public support for entering the war. This cycle continued into the Cold War, where bankers maintained control by supporting both sides of ideological conflicts. Ultimately, the central banking system ensures that financial elites emerge victorious while nations remain indebted and powerless, echoing the idea that with enough resources, one can easily 'bet on both horses' in any conflict.