On a significant day marked by President Yoon Suk-yeol's declaration of a state of emergency, legal scholars pointed out multiple constitutional violations, questioning his rationale for such a move. The President invoked emergency provisions under the constitution, which strictly outlines conditions for declaration. The constitutional Article 77 mandates that an emergency can only be declared in situations of severe national crisis, such as war or grave disturbances to social order. Experts assert that current conditions do not warrant such a declaration and are far from a wartime state. Concerns arose as Yoon's actions did not comply with procedural requirements outlined in Article 77, which requires immediate notification to the National Assembly upon declaration. Instead, the National Assembly, with unanimous support, voted to revoke the emergency status just hours after it was declared. The situation escalated into debates about the potential abuse of presidential powers and the suppression of dissent, as critics claim that the emergency powers were misused for political enforcement rather than genuine public safety. Legal groups are now seeking a constitutional judgment regarding Yoon's emergency declaration, arguing it infringed on fundamental freedoms including assembly, expression, and political rights. This situation echoes a paradox where a leader, appointed to protect democracy, may inadvertently embrace authoritarian practices under the guise of crisis management.
*
hawa bundu helped DAVEN to generate this content on
12/04/2024
.