Make

Former Detective's Guilt Over Wrongful Death Row Conviction

The New York Times

106

In this emotional account, a former detective named Brian, who is now in ministry, revisits a case from 2002 where he helped convict Robert Robertson for the murder of his daughter Nikki, which was initially attributed to shaken baby syndrome. Over the years, Brian wrestles with the decision, especially as new evidence emerges revealing that Nikki had undiagnosed medical issues that could have led to her injuries. Additionally, it was discovered that Robertson has autism, explaining his unemotional demeanor at the hospital. Brian regrets not having considered these factors earlier. As Robert's attorney reopens the case, Brian firmly believes that human judicial systems are too fallible to justly enforce the death penalty. He advocates for its abolition, admitting to the deep personal guilt he feels for his role in Robert's conviction and expressing his hope for making things right.

Highlights

• Brian, a former detective, reflects on his role in convicting Robert Robertson.
• In 2002, Robert's daughter Nikki died, originally believed to be a result of shaken baby syndrome.
• Robert was unemotional at the hospital, raising suspicion of his guilt.
• Robert was convicted and placed on death row.
• Years later, new evidence shows Nikki had severe medical conditions.
• Robert has autism, explaining his unemotional behavior.
• Brian now believes Robert was wrongly convicted.
• The case has caused Brian deep personal guilt and ethical dilemmas.
• Brian advocates for the abolition of the death penalty, citing human fallibility.
• The transcript highlights the emotional toll and ethical responsibilities of those involved in such cases.