Judicial Reform Debate Raises Concerns

Today, an intense debate took place involving lawmakers, including Raúl Bolaños from the Green Party, who criticized the recent judicial reform approved by the Senate. It was argued that this reform grants 'constitutional supremacy', as it eliminates defense mechanisms for states and citizens, potentially paving the way for an authoritarian government. Emil Álvarez and other legislators responded by stating that the reform merely legitimizes what was already implicit in the law, ensuring that constitutional controversies and protections have not been effectively utilized in the past. This controversy reflects a broader struggle between the Legislative and Judicial branches, emphasizing the importance of citizens' rights and liberties in the face of reforms that could silence dissenting voices. The debate also touched on the independence of the judiciary and the impact of judicial decisions on legislation, with certain representatives advocating for a return to serious and constructive discussions instead of insults or misunderstandings. The discussion continues to generate polarization, with calls to maintain intact citizens' freedoms and rights amid the growing authority of the government.